Subscribe Twitter Twitter

Monday, September 3, 2012

Personal Poverty Coaches For the Poor

At least this is what the newest poverty reduction experiment being run in Haiti is all about. It sounds a bit silly, to be honest, but I like the attitude of trying new things out, and testing whether it works or not.
Half of the commune’s 10,000 households are being assigned a “household development agent” — a neighbour who will work as a health educator, vaccinator, epidemiologist, financial analyst, social worker, scheduler and advocate all at the same time. With the agent’s help, a family will assess its needs and come up with a plan to make things better. 
“The idea is to forge a relationship from the get-go,” said Maryanne Sharp, an official at the World Bank, which is overseeing the $4 million project. “We want the family to say, ‘Yes, we own the plan and we will work on these objectives on this timetable.’  
“The other 5,000 households will function as a control group, continuing as they have, scrounging out a living in one of Haiti’s poorest and most isolated places. 
In two years, the families will be resurveyed and their children and houses re-examined. If those with agents are doing better, then the strategy of coaching people out of poverty may be expanded to the whole country.
On the other hand, I am quite skeptical. Of course they will find statistically significant effects of the program. But in order to convince me that this will be a viable program, they need to show that such it  is 1. viable (come on, how much would a personal assistant cost, their training, etc.?) and 2. are the effects, aside from being statistically significant, economically significant? There is a difference.

HT to Tyler Cowen at Marginal Revolution


Post a Comment